Writing

17 Book Outline Templates, Compared: Which One Fits the Book You're Actually Writing

Editor10 min read

Disclosure: we build CipherWrite, whose template catalogue is the one described below. The structures themselves are the public property of Aristotle, Snyder, Campbell, Wells, Harmon, Hayes and Ingermanson — nothing here is invented, and the comparison holds whatever you outline in.

There are two ways to fail at outlining, and most advice only warns you about one.

The famous failure is the writer who outlines for eleven months, because outlining feels like progress and cannot be judged. The quieter failure is the writer who picks the wrong template — a hero's journey for a domestic drama, a save-the-cat beat sheet for a slow literary novel — then spends the second act trying to force a shape the book was never going to take, and concludes they cannot plot.

So the useful question is not "what are the story structures?" It is "which of these is right for the specific book in front of me, and where does it stop being right?"

Key takeaways

  • Eight story structures, nine genre kits. The structures give you a spine; the kits overlay a genre's reader promises on top of one.
  • Beats are timing, not content. A structure tells you where the energy changes, never what happens.
  • Word targets make a beat sheet usable. "Midpoint at 50%" is abstract; "midpoint at 45,000 words" is a plan.
  • Every honest template names when it is the wrong tool. If yours doesn't, it is marketing.
  • Two templates are genuinely free forever — Three-Act for fiction, the Non-Fiction Book Kit for everyone else.
  • Keep the outline out of the manuscript. Scaffold chapters pollute the draft, the word count and the export.

The eight story structures

Each of these was derived by somebody looking at stories that work and asking where the turns are. They overlap heavily, which is a point in their favour — several independent observers converging on the same shape is evidence, not redundancy.

Template Beats Attribution Free?
Three-Act Structure 11 Aristotle, Poetics; Syd Field, Screenplay (1979) Free forever
Save the Cat Beat Sheet 15 Blake Snyder (2005); Jessica Brody's novel adaptation (2018) Pro
Hero's Journey 12 Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949); Vogler (1992) Pro
Seven-Point Story Structure 7 Dan Wells (2010), after Lester Dent's pulp master plot Pro
Fichtean Curve 4, crises repeatable Named for Fichte; popularised for novelists by John Gardner (1983) Pro
Freytag's Pyramid 5 Gustav Freytag, Die Technik des Dramas (1863) Pro
Story Circle 8 Dan Harmon, distilled from Campbell's monomyth Pro
Snowflake Method 10 steps Randy Ingermanson (2014) Pro

Three-Act Structure — the one to start with

Eleven beats, and the irreducible shape underneath nearly everything else: a setup that establishes a world worth disrupting, a disruption, an escalation that costs the protagonist more than they expected, and a resolution that settles the question the setup asked.

Use it if this is your first book, or if you have no strong instinct, or if previous attempts at outlining have felt like filling in a form. It carries no ideology. It is free on every plan.

Not for: writers who need more granular guidance than "act two is long and hard." That is precisely what act two is, and Three-Act does not soften it.

Save the Cat — the most precise map in commercial fiction

Fifteen beats with exact percentage markers, which is the reason it took over commercial publishing. It does not say "the midpoint should come somewhere in the middle." It says the Catalyst is at 10%, the Midpoint at 50%, the All Is Lost at 75%, and a beat sheet with numbers is a schedule rather than a philosophy.

The tagline is fair: "Fifteen beats with exact percentage markers. The most precise map in commercial fiction."

Not for: meandering literary fiction, or writers who feel supervised by numbers. The precision is the feature and the drawback in the same breath.

Hero's Journey — departure, initiation, return

Twelve stages, Campbell by way of Vogler. Its distinctive claim is that the return matters as much as the departure: the protagonist comes back to the ordinary world carrying something, and the book is really about what that costs.

Best for fantasy, adventure, and any story where the protagonist physically leaves.

Not for: stories with no threshold to cross. A novel set entirely in one marriage can be shoehorned into it, and the shoehorning shows.

Seven-Point — start from the ending

Dan Wells' compression of Lester Dent's pulp plot, and the only one on this list that explicitly tells you to build the book backwards: decide the resolution first, then the hook that is its opposite, then the midpoint turn between them.

"Start with your ending, then build the book backwards from it." For plot-driven thrillers this is often the fastest route from idea to workable spine.

Not for: discovery writers, for whom deciding the ending first removes the reason to write.

Fichtean Curve — open in crisis, escalate

Four movements, but the crises are repeatable, which is the whole point: no slow beginning, no gentle establishing chapters. Start in trouble and make it worse in a rising series until the climax.

"No slow beginning. Open in crisis and escalate, crisis by crisis." Horror and suspense live here.

Not for: books whose power depends on establishing a peaceful world worth losing. Some novels earn their crisis; this shape does not let you.

Freytag's Pyramid — the classical shape

Five parts, from 1863, and unusual today for treating the falling action as substantial rather than as a wind-down. Written for tragedy, and it remains the best available shape for a book where the protagonist's descent is the story.

Not for: commercial fiction with an upbeat resolution. The pyramid's back half is built for a fall.

Story Circle — eight steps, character first

Harmon's distillation: you, need, go, search, find, take, return, change. Deceptively simple and unusually good at diagnosing an existing draft, because you can map a finished manuscript onto it in twenty minutes and immediately see which of the eight is missing.

Strong for memoir and character-driven fiction.

Not for: intricately plotted mysteries, where the machinery needs more than eight slots.

Snowflake Method — a process, not a shape

Ten steps rather than beats, moving from one sentence to a paragraph to character summaries to a scene list. Ingermanson's insight is that a blank outline is as paralysing as a blank page, so the method never asks you to make a big decision — only to expand the last small one.

"Ten steps from one sentence to a scene list."

Not for: anyone who already has a spine. It is a bootstrapping process, and running it on a book you already understand is busywork.

The nine genre starter kits

A structure is genre-agnostic. A genre kit takes a spine and adds the promises the genre's readers turn up expecting, plus genre-specific prompts and seeded story-bible cards.

  • Fantasy — Hero's Journey spine. A world that holds together and a magic system with a price, after Sanderson's laws. The card that matters most: what does the magic cost?
  • Sci-Fi — three-act spine. One big change to the world, followed all the way down to what it does to people. The failure mode is a brilliant premise with no human consequence.
  • Horror — Fichtean Curve spine. A dread ledger, and explicit rules for the thing in the dark. Unbreakable rules are what make a monster frightening rather than arbitrary.
  • Romance — Gwen Hayes' Romancing the Beat four phases, mirrored leads, and a Black Moment that holds. The genre contract is non-negotiable and the kit says so.
  • Romantasy — two arcs on one spine: the quest and the relationship escalate together, beat for beat. This is the ACOTAR and Fourth Wing pattern, and it is the hardest kit in the catalogue to execute because the two arcs must peak in the right order. We took it apart in how to outline a romantasy.
  • Thriller — seven-point spine. A villain with a working plan, and a clock the reader can hear. If the antagonist's plan would fail without the protagonist's mistakes, you have a problem.
  • Mystery — fair-play structure: a clue ledger, honest red herrings, and a reveal the reader could have reached. The ledger is the entire craft of the genre.
  • Memoir — Story Circle spine, plus Vivian Gornick's situation-versus-story distinction, the container, and the two selves — the person who lived it and the person telling it.
  • Non-Fiction Book Kit — one promise, one reader, and a chapter engine that repeats until the book is finished. Free forever, which matters because non-fiction writers are usually the ones told to go read a novel-writing book.

You can read all seventeen in full at cipherwrite.com/book-outline-templates.

The two details that make a template usable

Most template lists give you names and beats. Two things decide whether a beat sheet survives contact with a real manuscript.

Word targets, not percentages

"Midpoint at 50%" is a fact about structure. "Midpoint at 45,000 words, and you are at 61,000" is a fact about your Tuesday.

Every beat in a good catalogue carries the percentage of finished word count where it lands, which converts to a real word range as soon as you name a target length. This turns the outline from a diagram into a schedule — and it makes the most common structural problem visible early, because a first act that has swallowed 40% of your word budget is a measurable event rather than a vague unease.

It also links straight into the nine-stage writing sequence: once you know the target length, every beat has a deadline.

An honest "not for"

Every template in the catalogue names when it is the wrong tool. This is rarer than it should be, and it is not modesty — it is the difference between a catalogue and a sales page. A writer who picks Fichtean for a quiet family novel will spend three months fighting the shape and blame themselves. One sentence of honesty upstream prevents that, and honesty converts better than hype anyway.

Keep the outline out of the manuscript

A structural point that is easy to get wrong and expensive to undo.

When you apply a template, the beats should land in their own document, not as placeholder chapters inside the draft. Scaffold chapters seem harmless until they are inflating your word count, appearing in your export, showing up in your search results, and needing to be manually stripped before submission — usually at the worst possible moment.

In CipherWrite the applied template fills a per-project Blueprint and seeds story-bible cards, and never touches the manuscript. Which brings up the second reason, and it is the one most outlining guides never mention:

An outline names your ending in a hundred words. It is the most spoiler-dense artefact you will ever produce — the twist, the death, the reveal, compressed. If any part of your book deserves not to sit in plaintext on a server you do not control, it is arguably the outline rather than the draft. So it is encrypted client-side exactly like the manuscript, which is a design consequence of the same constraint we wrote about in why an encrypted writing app matters.

The unusual free/Pro split

Two templates are free on every plan, forever: Three-Act for fiction, and the Non-Fiction Book Kit for everyone else. That is deliberate — both halves of the audience get a real, applicable blueprint without paying, rather than a teaser.

The more interesting part is what is not paywalled: the full text of every template is readable by anyone. Every beat, its purpose, its classic failure, its word target, on the public page. You meet the paywall only when you apply a template to a project and it fills your Blueprint and seeds the cards.

That is a defensible line, because the craft was never ours to sell — Aristotle, Snyder, Campbell, Wells, Harmon, Hayes and Ingermanson did that work, and several of them are quite dead. What Pro sells is the application: the beats installed in your project with your word targets, the story-bible cards seeded, and the whole thing encrypted alongside your draft. Current pricing lives on the pricing page.

Where to go next

If you know your genre but not your structure, start with the genre kit and let it choose the spine. If you know neither, use Three-Act and stop reading about structures — that is stage three of nine, and stages four through nine are where books get finished.

If the problem is not the outline at all but the fact that you have outlined four books and drafted none, that is a different diagnosis, and it is the subject of why most novels die in the middle.

Read the catalogue at cipherwrite.com/book-outline-templates, or compare the structures head to head first. Either way, pick one this week. The template you chose matters considerably less than the fact that you stopped choosing.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is a book outline template?

A beat sheet: an ordered list of the structural moments a story of a given shape needs, each with the job it does for the reader and roughly where it lands in the finished word count. A good template tells you four things per beat — its purpose, the prompts you answer to plan it, how it classically fails, and the percentage of the book at which it should occur, which converts to a real word range once you set a target length.

Which book outline template should a beginner use?

Three-Act Structure for fiction, and a non-fiction book kit for everything else. Three-Act has eleven beats, carries no ideology, and underlies most of the other structures, so nothing you learn from it is wasted if you later switch. It is also free on every plan of the CipherWrite template catalogue, as is the Non-Fiction Book Kit, so both halves of the audience can outline a real book without paying anything.

What is the difference between a story structure and a genre kit?

A story structure is the spine — the shape of change across the whole book, independent of subject. A genre kit overlays a chosen spine with the promises that genre's readers arrive expecting, plus extra prompts and seeded story-bible cards. Romantasy, for example, runs two arcs on one spine so the quest and the relationship escalate together, beat for beat; the underlying spine is still recognisable.

Does using a template make my book formulaic?

Only if you treat the beats as content rather than as timing. A structure tells you where the energy has to change, not what happens. Two novels can hit the same fifteen Save the Cat beats at the same percentages and share nothing else. The formulaic feeling almost always comes from a thin premise or a protagonist without an internal need, and neither of those is caused by the outline.

Should the outline live in the same document as the manuscript?

No, and this matters more than it sounds. Scaffold chapters holding beat notes end up polluting the draft, the word count and the export, and they have to be manually stripped before submission. Keeping the outline as its own document also has a privacy consequence worth noticing: an outline names your ending in a hundred words, which arguably makes it the last thing that should sit in plaintext on somebody else's server.

Can I read the templates without signing up?

On CipherWrite's catalogue, yes — the full text of every template is on the public page, including all the beats, their purposes, their pitfalls and the word targets. The paywall sits at the point where you apply a template to a project and it fills your Blueprint and seeds story-bible cards, not at the point where you read what the beats are.

T

Written by

The BlogsPublication Team

Editor

BlogsPublication is researched, written, and edited by a small team. We work from primary sources and link to them, a human editor is responsible for everything we publish, and we note substantive corrections on the article itself. Where AI tools help with research or drafting, a person still verifies the result before it runs.

BlogsPublication reporting is guided by our editorial standards.

The newsletter

Good writing, once a week.

Our best essays and reporting, delivered to your inbox. No noise, unsubscribe anytime.

Comments

Loading comments…

Keep reading

Writing

The AI Writing Coach That Diagnoses First, Then Teaches

Most writing advice fails not because it is wrong, but because it arrives out of order, undiagnosed and ungraded. CipherWrite's AI Writing Coach is built around those three gaps — and around a fixed catalogue of 32 craft modules the model is not allowed to invent around.

The BlogsPublication Team11 min